Epistemic theory of vagueness

Author: krcp

August undefined, 2024

WebSchiffer on the Epistemic Theory of Vagueness. Timothy Williamson - 1999 - Philosophical Perspectives 13:505-517. Varieties of Vagueness. Trenton Merricks - 2001 - Philosophy … WebFeb 8, 1997 · Vagueness (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Vagueness First published Sat Feb 8, 1997; substantive revision Thu Jun 16, 2024 There is wide …

Sorites Paradox (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Fall 2024 …

Web3.2 The Epistemic Theory. Most theorists of vagueness conceive of vagueness as a semantic phenomenon, as somehow rooted in the meanings of words like ‘tall’ and ‘old’. … WebThe epistemic theory claims that, in every sorites series, there is a counter-instance to the tolerance principle. The semanticist theories claim that the tolerance principle is false, or not altogether true, or that its truth is indeterminate, but they deny that there is generally any single counter-instance to the tolerance principle. hoffmann creme

Truthlikeness (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2024 …

WebJun 21, 2006 · Epistemic paradoxes affect decision theory because rational choices are based on beliefs and desires. If the agent cannot form a rational belief, ... –––, 2001, Vagueness and Contradiction, Oxford: Clarendon Press. –––, 2002, “Formal Problems in Epistemology”, ... Webvagueness. II. The Epistemic Theory Defined and Motivated Timothy Williamson, in a precis of Vagueness, defines the epistemic theory thus: it's the thesis that the proposition a … WebAnna Mahtani is an Associate Professor in the Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method at the London School of Economics and Political Science.. She completed her PhD on the Epistemic Theory of Vagueness at the University of Sheffield in 2005. She then took up a British Academy Postdoc at the University of Oxford, before moving to the … hoffmann crailsheim

Epistemology Philosophy The University of Sheffield

Thinking precisely about vagueness: an interview with Anna …

WebSep 11, 2024 · The epistemic theory of vagueness makes the connection between meaning and use no harder to understand than it already is. At worst, there may be no account to be had, beyond a few vague salutary remarks. Meaning may supervene on … WebSep 7, 2004 · Abstract Recently a bold and admirable interpretation of Chrysippus's position on the Sorites has been presented, suggesting that Chrysippus offered a solution to the Sorites by (i) taking an... hoffmann csabaWeb1. A person with £5,000,000,000 is rich. 2. Someone does not go from being rich to being not rich by losing £1. 3. Therefore, someone with £4,999,999,999 is rich. (C) Therefore, someone with £6 is rich. Of course, we can reverse the process and generate a similar paradox involving the predicate ‘is poor’. hoffmann crawford siegen

"WebThe Epistemic Theory of Vagueness. Stephen Schiffer - 1999 - Philosophical Perspectives 13:481-503. Review: Précis of Vagueness. [REVIEW] Timothy Williamson - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):921 - 928. Schiffer on the Epistemic Theory of Vagueness. " - Epistemic theory of vagueness

Epistemic theory of vagueness

WebFirst published Wed Jun 21, 2006; substantive revision Thu Sep 7, 2024. Epistemic paradoxes are riddles that turn on the concept of knowledge ( episteme is Greek for knowledge). Typically, there are conflicting, well-credentialed answers to these questions (or pseudo-questions). Thus the riddle immediately informs us of an inconsistency. WebJul 10, 2024 · I was reading The Outer Limits of Reason: What Science, Mathematics, and Logic Cannot Tell Us by Noson S. Yanofsky and in some paragraphs of this books, The …

Did you know?

WebFeb 10, 2010 · This book defends the epistemic theory of vagueness, which maintains that vague predicates do have sharp boundaries, we just do not know where those …

WebJan 1, 2024 · Taking vagueness to be an epistemic phenomenon precludes the sense of agency needed for moral responsibility; taking it to be semantic does not. Thus I advance two arguments for semantic approaches to vagueness, as against epistemic approaches: one descriptive and one normative. Type Articles Information WebAbstract We argue that the epistemic theory of vagueness cannot adequately justify its key tenet-that vague predicates have precisely bounded extensions, of which we are necessarily ignorant. Nor can the theory adequately account for our ignorance of the truth values of borderline cases.

Web1 According to the epistemic theory of vagueness (mostly developed by Timothy Williamson Vague-ness), there is a fact of the matter about the application of vague … Weblanguage use and cognition has traditionally been interpreted in epistemic or semantic terms. The standard view of vagueness speciﬁcally suggests that considerations of agency or ... interpretations of rational credence for vagueness to adaptations of choice theory (dynamic choice theory, revealed preference models, social choice theory ...

WebDec 14, 2000 · The Epistemic Theory of Vagueness. Timothy Endicott. Published 14 December 2000. Philosophy. So far we have looked at theories on which vagueness is a …

WebMar 1, 2001 · Vagueness in Law Timothy A. O. Endicott First work to integrate philosophical arguments over the nature of vagueness with debates in legal theory over application of the law in `borderline cases' Argues that legal systems necessarily contain vague laws Gives a new account of the relation between incommensurability and … hoffmann crepespfanneWebFor, as I’ve already said, the epistemic theory entails that one is ignorant of the truth-value of what is said by a vague utterance in a borderline case, and there can be no such ignorance unless the propositions expressed … h \u0026 h veterinary care eugeneWebSep 11, 2013 · Epistemic theories of vagueness (“vagueness as ignorance”) do not treat vagueness as an ontological problem, but rather attribute vagueness to lack of knowledge (Sorensen, 1991; Williamson, 1994 ). Epistemic theories assume the existence of an exact definition in each case, but one which is unknown to us. h\u0026h truck and outdoor byron gaWebBonini et al. [2] present psychological data that they take to support an ‘epistemic’ account of how vague predicates are used in natural language. We argue that their data more strongly supports a ‘gap’ theory of vagueness, and that their arguments against gap theories are flawed. hoffmann csd16128WebThis essay defends an epistemicist response to the phenomenon of vagueness concerning moral terms. I outline a traditional model of -- and then two novel approaches to -- epistemicism about moral predicates, and I demonstrate how the foregoing are able to provide robust explanations of the source of moral, as epistemic, indeterminacy. h \u0026 h wallpapersWebDec 4, 2014 · The epistemic theorist claims that classical logic holds for ordinary language, but on the degree theorist’s account we need to construct a new sort of logic that works with degrees of truth rather than simply truth and falsity. The answer to the question ‘how should we reason’ has a wide-reaching effect on philosophical work. hoffmann custom homes l.l.c. moWebJan 17, 1997 · In effect, the counter-intuitive aspects of the epistemic theory are avoided only at a cost to other intuitions. ... -schema is said to lead to absurdity (Williamson (1994), ch. 7). This charge applies more generally to any non-bivalent theory of vagueness coupled with the T-schema. If validated, ... hoffmann csd36308