Remotesoft protect
http://www.nullskull.com/articles/20021213.asp WebOct 8, 2024 · Remotesoft .NET Explorer works together with Remotesoft's decompiler and obfuscator, and acts as a console for easy navigation and powerful code editing and printing. ... Distribute trial versions of your apps and protect your .NET source codes. Skater .NET Obfuscator . Obfuscates NET code and protects it from illegal code extraction.
Remotesoft protect
Did you know?
WebAug 30, 2024 · Remotesoft do a obfuscator than is very effective and one i've found to be the most secure. Reason is they also do a decompiler/de-obfuscator. It's a small program that can actually de-obfuscate an assembly, why they would want to produce such a thing is beyond me, probably to bolster their own place in the market, as their de-obfuscator won't … WebAug 18, 2010 · Salamander obfuscator is very hard to decompile, so coding an "ending date" in the indicator itself, and protect it is simple and efficient. It's possible to imagine more …
WebDec 21, 2010 · I use RemoteSoft's protector to protect from disassembly of commercial software deployed on client machines. However, getting the DLL's and EXE protected then … WebJun 19, 2014 · These slender & sophisticated 2-Way remote controls feature a clean sleek ergonomic industrial design made to fit the user's hand comfortably enabling effortless and intuitive single-handed operation as Brilliant LEDs confirm your commands.You will love the way the Responder LE remote feels in your hand and the many state-of-the-art system …
WebFeb 17, 2004 · Is there a more econimical way to stop people from decompiling my .Net product? I dont have $1900 to spend on the .Net Decompiler Protector. Anyone have any thoughts/experiences with these or simliar products? Is Microsoft working on a solution to this problem? ..Net Decompiler - $1100... WebJavascript Obfuscator can. compress .js files using an unique compression algorithm with impressive compression ratio; remove comments, line feeds and white spaces, reducing the file size and minimizing the loading time; generate new unintelligible names and rename functions and variables depending on the selected settings; command line support.
http://java-applets.org/java-javascript-obfuscation.html
WebAug 13, 2024 · Download. link when available. Edit program info. Info updated on: Aug 13, 2024. Software Informer. Download popular programs, drivers and latest updates easily. Remotesoft .NET Linker is developed by Remotesoft. The most popular versions of this product among our users are: 1.0 and 2.1. The product will soon be reviewed by our … thomas axfordWebNov 22, 2005 · 1. Who makes the only commercial decompiler? RemoteSoft 2. Who released Protector? RemoteSoft Fox in the chicken house. What level of protection do you need? … udit softwareWebMay 21, 2010 · I understand an upgrade to Remotesoft's Protector v3.1 is needed to protect 64-bit assemblies. There was a post suggesting they would have something out by the … thomas axerWebApr 27, 2012 · It protects .NET Dlls and EXEs from being decompiled. Advanced code protection techniques is implemented with obfuscator for assembly protection. Try .NET Obfuscator. www.maycoms.net. advertisements are against forums policy. this thread is two years old and has already been answered and closed. Rudy =8^D. thomas axford vcWebJan 7, 2009 · Salamander .NET obfuscator is a .NET code protection tool that offers the most sophisticated technologies to protect your .NET code and intellectual properties. The obfuscator transforms your .NET assemblies (in C#, VB.NET, C++.NET, J#, MSIL, etc.) in such a way that decompilation of the new format would result in source code that is … udi triage wizard entsvcs.netWebMar 29, 2010 · The absolute best possible protection is RemoteSoft's Protector. Protector is not an obsfucator (obsfucated code can still be disassembled to IL). Protector is to my knowledge, the only tool that converts managed code into native machine code, making it as difficult to reverse-engineer as compiled native C++. thomas axleyWebI have tested this. The publckey with a strong name can be removed whether it is added to the program set or to the class. Therefore, a strong name is not a perfect protection method. However, if there is a good solution that can be used with strong names, a very good mechanism will be established to prevent modification and abuse. thomas axiata