Section 271 1 c of income tax act 1961
WebScrutiny under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) was conducted whereby an addition in respect of interest expenditure was made. Consequently, penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act were initiated against the Assessee company by reason of concealment of income/ furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income.
Section 271 1 c of income tax act 1961
Did you know?
Web31 Mar 2024 · Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act is an important provision that helps the government ensure that taxpayers file accurate and truthful income tax returns. … WebSection - 279. Prosecution to be at instance of Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner. 1 2. 16 Record (s) Page [ of …
Web13 hours ago · In respect of payment for preventive health check-up: In the case of an individual: (A) where the aggregate of such payment does not. Exceed rs. 5,000. the whole of such sum; (B) where the aggregate of such payment exceed. Rs. 5,000. Rs. 5,000. Tags: income tax act 1961, Income Tax Deductions. WebA bare look at the provisions of the section 271(1)(c) of I.T. Act 1961 ( in short ‘1961 Act) shows that satisfaction of the concerned tax authority to the effect that the assessee ...
Web5 Aug 2024 · You are required to show cause why order imposing penalty under section 271F of Income-tax Act,1961 should not be passed as initiated by the penalty notice referred above. 4. Kindly submit your response along with supporting documentary evidence(s) if any, electronically in 'e-Proceeding' facility through your account in e-filing website … Web11 Apr 2024 · 11 April 2024 3:15 AM GMT. The Supreme Court has ruled that no penalty is leviable under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on mere delay in remittance of the tax deducted at source (TDS ...
Web10 Apr 2024 · The Supreme Court Monday held that no penalty shall be leviable under section 271C of the Income Tax Act over mere belated remittance of the tax deducted at …
Web15 hours ago · ITAT Delhi held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act alleging inaccurate particulars not leviable as assessee was subjected to tax on book profits u/s … hydrocortisone therapeutic useWeb1 the Delhi High Court (HC) has held that penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) should have been completed by the tax officer (TO) within six months from the date of receipt of the order of the Commissioner (Appeal). In detail Facts which the tax department The taxpayer was engaged mass effect husk headWebSection 271(1)(c) is a sine qua non for initiation of penalty proceedings. ii)The existence of such conditions should be discernible from the assessment order or the order of the … hydrocortisone testWeb22 Mar 2024 · The Delhi High Court has ruled that a penalty order passed by the income tax authority under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without granting a hearing … hydrocortisone thuocWeb1 day ago · For the sake of natural justice, another show cause notice u/s 271D of the Act vide dated 27.05.2024 was issued to the assessee as to why an order imposing a penalty … hydrocortisone thrushWeb1 Aug 2024 · Introduction- Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. When an assessment order is made under the Income Tax Act, 1961(the “Act”) certain additions and … mass effect husks organic or syntheticWeb6 Aug 2024 · The AO, subsequently levied penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act for an amount of Rs. 77,24,049/- on account of concealment of income. 8.1 On appeal before … hydrocortisone tight foreskin